Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNKNOWN

ON A POINT OF LAW. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, Wednesday. Mr. Justice Cooper gave judgment today in the important income tax case Whiterock and Marainanga Estate Companies v. Commissioner of Taxes, claiming a refund of taxes allegedly overpaid. His Honor said this was an action brought to recover from the Commissioner £2050 paid under protest. Geo. D. Greenwood, of Canterbury, in ISJOi? agreed to purchase Whiterocks, Canterbury, from one Nicholls, for £75,000, and stock, etc., for £25,000. Half the purchase money of £IOO,OOO was paia off before it was determined to resell. Greenwood formed a private company with 35,000 shares, and took up all but two shares. The object of the company was to acquire Whiterocks and carry on tho sheep-farming business. Its real object, said Mr. Justice Cooper, was to enable Greenwood to avoid the higher rate for graduated land tax if Teviotdale, which he owned, and Whiterocks were both vested in him. The company then bought the adjoining property ot 558 acres at £0 per acre, and sold the whole of its property at a profit. The Commissioner of Taxes assessed income tax on that profit, and the company paid it under protest, and the Court was asked to decided whether the company was liable to be so assessed.

His Honor said the point of law was an extremely narrow one—was ihe principal business of the company that os dealing in land? In his opinion it was not. The sale of the estate was in the ordinary course of business, and tho purpose of the formation of the company was solely to avoid the graduated tax. Greenwood was a sheep fanner and a wealthy man, and there was-no indication that he was the class cf man hit at by the statute. The persons whom the Legislature intended to affect with liability were land speculators. Judgment was for plaintiffs for the amount claimed, with costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110105.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 255, 5 January 1911, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
317

UNKNOWN Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 255, 5 January 1911, Page 2

UNKNOWN Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 255, 5 January 1911, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert