COURT OF APPEAL.
8 i • - * •< , '£ ' NOKTH v.iBIRTLIXQ. , ', | THE ItfXfTv. LEWIS. I By Telegraph.—Preai'iAs'ociation. I ' ' Welliftvton. Last Sight. |n the case ■Norton"-(Truth)■■*». Birt-, life, tho Court of appeal graritetl flnali leave to appeal to Stile Privy Council. in the Crown case' reserved, the King v.| Lewis, the Court unanimously held 'hat the pn|pner elftml an habitual I '.criminal,'-"deciding that convictions for the offences named though in the Ma<rist-'te^"Co'urtV , counf J calculating the number of offences for the, purpose, of ,a that the prisoner is an liiabit\ja,l criminal, and convictions upon indictment were not essential: Mr Justice Williams, '., ■ the course/of hi|\ 'fd that the; Crown should apjoincicounv sel to argue Crown "cases reserved; gn behalf of the ,prisoner.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19100804.2.48
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 99, 4 August 1910, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
116COURT OF APPEAL. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 99, 4 August 1910, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in