INDIAN REFORMS.
Lolif) JIuKLEY'S MOTION HIiJECTEU
j . ~ London, March 10, l.i tl.c Jlou-o of Lords, a j ti from t.he (lovemment of India li, T> t ' t . , UI , I, fon ' u ' r objections to j Hf 1 rovimml Kxocutivo Councils no »ngor jm,i the same force of adding powers to thoist' proposed under clause " wo,l 'd be sparingly and «'"dually used. \ iseount Morlev's motion, at tho jeport stage, to 'restore the clause, was rejected. Lord Curzon urged the necessity nf consulting rulers aiul leading classes in India. B
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19090312.2.19.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 40, 12 March 1909, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
88INDIAN REFORMS. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LII, Issue 40, 12 March 1909, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in