Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

BREACHES OF AWARDS. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, Last Night. At the Arbitration Court to-dny, Thomson, Lewis and Co., aerated water manufacturers, were charged with paying less than the award rate to two machine bottlers. Jlr. Lewis stated that just after the award was announced lie found there was no provision to ( teach men machine bottling. One of the men fell sick, and ho had to teach a man to do the work. The Court decided simply to record) tt' breach in the ease. Humphries ilros. i were cited for a breach of tfie award in the plasterers' dispute in having employed a non-unionist plasterer. The Court described this case as trivial and simply recorded a breach. .f. Rod, butcher, was cited for employing Edgar Cornelius at less than tha award rate. Mr. Rod said that Cornelius was not competent to earn the fuli rate.' The Court held that the breach had been committed deliberately. A fine of £5 was imposed on the respondent and against Cornelius a breach was simply recorded. A similar case was

that aguhist Mr. MeManns for paying less than the award rate to his cook and his waitress, Maggio Whitford and Emily Hyland respectively. The respondent (licensee of tlu; "Railway Hotel) had admitted the facts, but hncV refused to pay the arrears! Neither of the other respondents, the cook and the waitress, knew what the award rate was. -The respondent was fined £5 in respect of tlu two eases, and breaches were recorded in the cases of the two employees. (J)ias. H. William*, liotclkeeper, was fined £2 for employing John Stoekhridge at /ess than the award rate of pay. Stockbridge was fined 10s. The Levin Meat and Cold Storage Co. was fined £2 for employfug Charles Bolton at less limn the award rate. Bolton was fined 10s» 'lhe Court was asked to decide wthei they the employment of a waiter for a period of one wvek at 30s was a breach of the casual labor clause of/ the award which fixes the wages of cas- ( nal laborers at a day for the first * wages. The Court held that a weekly ) contract was not casual labor. *

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19080827.2.16

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 211, 27 August 1908, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 211, 27 August 1908, Page 2

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 211, 27 August 1908, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert