Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOT THE VERDICT.

A Canadian barrister named McSweeuy was a thorough student of human na- j turc and master of the art of obscrva- j tion. Nothing escaped his notice. While ( engaged upon a ease iie watched the j jury as a cat watches a mouse, and frequently astonished his clients by ending his arguments very abruptly and ' submitting the matter to the jury. ' •'I have known many a case to have < been talked to death after it had been ' won," he said. "What is the use of wasting time and breath after the jury is converted to your way of thinking! i 1 believe I can tell when 1 have my jury well in hand. At that point I stop, no "matter in what shape it leaves my speech. I take it that a client employs a lawyer to win his ease, and not_to display his oratorical abilities." The peculiarity of the great criminal lawyer was well shown at a murder trial in Montreal a few years ago. Mr. McSweeney appeared for the defendant. The State had apparently made out a very clear ease against the prisoner. When Mr. McSweeny arose to make his address to the jury he carefully avoided any reference to the facts set forth in the evidence or the laws governing them. He pointed out the terrible responsibility resting upon the twelve men who were sitting in judgment upon the life of one of their fellow-citizens. He added that the verdict of guilty would not fall heaviest upon the prisoner, but upon his family. He asked the jury to think for a moment of the effect of an adverse verdict upon the wife and little ones of the prisoner. Then the lawyer drew a word picture which was a marvel of rhetorical work. He brought before the eyes of the jurymen the home of the accused man. He showed the patient and loving wife leaving her work to cast many an anxious glance down the road to see if her husband was yet in sight, eager to be the first to catch a glimpse of his figure in the distance, and to have a steaming supper awaiting him upon his arrival. I He pictured three ruddy-faced children swinging upon the old gate.Vaiting till papa should come home to them. At this point the lawyer noticed that one of the jurymen had considerable difficulty iu swallowing a large lump which choked him, and that there w,as a suspicious moisture in his eye. ! The speaker paused. Turning towarilthe juror, he held out both hands n<= a little child might have il'one to its | fialther, and said, in a ton? that was [ scarcely audible: — - ficntlemcn, you must send him home | to them."

Shifting uneasily in his seat, the juror blurted out:— "Yes; we'll do it, too." McSweney instantly sat down. The case was won. His client was acquitted. But the most interesting point in this case was the fact, which the la .vyer afterwards learned, that the prisoner at the bar was an unmarried man:

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19080704.2.18

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 166, 4 July 1908, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
507

GOT THE VERDICT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 166, 4 July 1908, Page 3

GOT THE VERDICT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 166, 4 July 1908, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert