GOT THE VERDICT.
A Canadian barrister named McSweeuy was a thorough student of human na- j turc and master of the art of obscrva- j tion. Nothing escaped his notice. While ( engaged upon a ease iie watched the j jury as a cat watches a mouse, and frequently astonished his clients by ending his arguments very abruptly and ' submitting the matter to the jury. ' •'I have known many a case to have < been talked to death after it had been ' won," he said. "What is the use of wasting time and breath after the jury is converted to your way of thinking! i 1 believe I can tell when 1 have my jury well in hand. At that point I stop, no "matter in what shape it leaves my speech. I take it that a client employs a lawyer to win his ease, and not_to display his oratorical abilities." The peculiarity of the great criminal lawyer was well shown at a murder trial in Montreal a few years ago. Mr. McSweeney appeared for the defendant. The State had apparently made out a very clear ease against the prisoner. When Mr. McSweeny arose to make his address to the jury he carefully avoided any reference to the facts set forth in the evidence or the laws governing them. He pointed out the terrible responsibility resting upon the twelve men who were sitting in judgment upon the life of one of their fellow-citizens. He added that the verdict of guilty would not fall heaviest upon the prisoner, but upon his family. He asked the jury to think for a moment of the effect of an adverse verdict upon the wife and little ones of the prisoner. Then the lawyer drew a word picture which was a marvel of rhetorical work. He brought before the eyes of the jurymen the home of the accused man. He showed the patient and loving wife leaving her work to cast many an anxious glance down the road to see if her husband was yet in sight, eager to be the first to catch a glimpse of his figure in the distance, and to have a steaming supper awaiting him upon his arrival. I He pictured three ruddy-faced children swinging upon the old gate.Vaiting till papa should come home to them. At this point the lawyer noticed that one of the jurymen had considerable difficulty iu swallowing a large lump which choked him, and that there w,as a suspicious moisture in his eye. ! The speaker paused. Turning towarilthe juror, he held out both hands n<= a little child might have il'one to its | fialther, and said, in a ton? that was [ scarcely audible: — - ficntlemcn, you must send him home | to them."
Shifting uneasily in his seat, the juror blurted out:— "Yes; we'll do it, too." McSweney instantly sat down. The case was won. His client was acquitted. But the most interesting point in this case was the fact, which the la .vyer afterwards learned, that the prisoner at the bar was an unmarried man:
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19080704.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 166, 4 July 1908, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
507GOT THE VERDICT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 166, 4 July 1908, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.