INGLEWOOD S.M. COURT.

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LI, Issue 44, 11 February 1908, Page 3

INGLEWOOD S.M. COURT.

(From Our Own Correspondent^. The monthly sitting of the Magistrate's Court was held on Monday before Mr. A. Turbull, S.M. Judgment weut by default in the following case*:—A. K. Surrey v. J. I*. Kennedy, claim 5a sd, costs ss; K. I'. Lawson v. H. Ward, claim £1 !os, costs ss; I W. Rolston, v. F. Kennedy, claim £3, costs us; Moa Fanners' Union v. T. Taylor, claim £l4 1!),, costs 30s lid (Mr. Crombie for plaintiffs); J. Manswer v. A. and B. Wisnewski, claim £3 Ms fld, coats 13s, (Mr Thomson for plaintiff)DEFENDED CASKS. Tohe Pakanga, v. M. C. Lawson, claim £1) for cattle iflcgcrt to have been sold to defendant's servant. Xon suited, with costs 21s. Mr Crombie appealed for plaintilf, and Mr. Sellers for defendant.

\V. 11. Fi-anklyu v. M. Schob-s, claim £3 12s, balance of rent owing since 1903.—N0n-suited without costs. Mr. Thompson appeared for plaintilf and Mr. Crombie for defendant. JUDGMENT SUMMONSES.

Vieleers and Stevens v. .i. Rogers, claim £ls 5a fid. No appearance of defendant, who was ordered to pay the amount, forthwith; in default 14 days in New Plymouth gaol, Warrant will lie suspended if £3 5s 6d is paid hy 15th inst, and balance by monthly instalments of £3 Sutherland Bros. v. R. N. White, claim £8 8s lid. No appearand of defendant. Ordered to pay the amount forthwith; in default a week's impris- | onment in New Plymouth <>aol. Warrant to be suspended if £1 18s lid is piid hv Ath March next and balance by monthly instalments of C 3 10s each. 11. J. Julian v. T. Glynn, claim C 3 5s •2d. No appearance of defendant. Ordered to pay the mount forthwith: in lb-fault a week's imprisonment in New ! Plymouth gaol. Warrant -uspenrted Ji>r , a 'month. Mr. TU-nn-oii appeared for ! all the imminent creditors. ; "OTHER CASES. Police v. M. -T. O.Rilley. charged with entering licensed premises while prohibited—Fined 10s nnd costs 13s. Police v. IT. Schwieters. charged with maiming a mare. After hearing the evidence for the prosecution, Mr Thomson. I (counsel for defendant), made application I to kivc the matter dealt with summari!> This (be Ma-ji-trate consented to ■ hi.' and after hearing further evidence 1 on'behalf of defendant, lined liim £"•• r.ishell v. BMiell. -This was an application made by Mrs. BUicll against I ber children for maintenance. Orders i were made bv consent as follows; - I Winst A. T,.' Bi-hell for -3s per weeT<, I Y.'nnd A. Bishell 5- each per week, and |K. Bishell 2s per week. Mr Thomson appeared for complaint. Twelve other cases on the cause li-fc were either '-paid into Court." "confessed." or "not served."

Nine old-ape pensions were renewed, and one new claim refused.