Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

Per Press Association.

Duncdin, Last night. The case Harrison v. Moses and Pittar, claim for £2OOO damages for al- - leged neglect and unskilful extraction of teeth, was continued in the Supreme Court to-day. Evidence was given by. Doctors Boberts, Evans, and Delautour, the two former stating that plaintiff waj suffering from consumption, and the latter stating that examination by means of X rays had failed to disclose the presence of a tooth in the lung. The evidence for the defence has now 010864 ~ a^iMma

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19071204.2.12.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 61, 4 December 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
86

SUPREME COURT Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 61, 4 December 1907, Page 2

SUPREME COURT Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 61, 4 December 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert