Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT.

HOOK v. SIUEL tlwlgment was delivered yostcrda morning in the matter of the appeal b Richard Julia Shiel against. the decisio of My (i. W. iiiddell, &.M., in Jlook 1 •Shit'l. The uppci] was heard at the n mit Mew I'lVinuiuh sessions of th District (.'ourt by .Mr District Jitdg llaselden. Air Westou appeared for th appellant, and Mr Kerr for the.respoi clout. 11)0 appellant \v:is adjudged by th Magi-dinte to he tlx? putative fatho of the female infant of the responden J'. D. I look. Tin-. circumstances, sal His iionnr, were peculiar, but ho di not intend to review thorn in dotai They rcvonli'd weik immorality on th part of the woman, and cold depravit; on Hie purl of tile man. Xo good pm pose would be served by setting < u par Ocularly tin*repulsive featureswhic were present in .this case. Th'-re . v. f a much eon!radietion between tlie partie as to dales, and the respondent had i the various stages of the litigatio. shifted the date more than once. Tak big the last possible date as alleged b; her jis the Hth May, it pave the ?0 days, as the period of gestation, to ta birth on the 2nd March. If this Weill ease of legitimation this period woul not he considered as proof of illegiti macy, but in affiliation cases a dilferen rule applied. There was a presumpiioi of legitimacy in favor of children bor; ill wedlock. There was 110 such pre sumption here. The. general eircinr stances of the case did not favor th supposition of abnormally protracts gestation, and on the medical testiinon; Mis Honor was of opinion that, it \va; in the highest degree improbable thr tho nppellmt was the father of th< respondent's child, and therefore theiv could he no reasonable certainty thai lie was. The appeal would be allow.*] lmt, considering the conduct of* the ap pelhntj without costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070822.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 22 August 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
319

DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 22 August 1907, Page 2

DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 22 August 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert