PAK-A-POO.
Per Press Association. Wellington, July 11). In I lie paka-poo case, before the Anneal Curt, Air Wilford for the appellant raised twlmical objections and also argued that pal;-a-poo was not a game in which prizes were distributed by a mode oi chance, as each player made" a separate wager with the bunk. and. if lie won, he c.iud not i„. sai.l to have won what was ordinarily called a prize. The mo- «<•}• I'iud lor a ticket was eertainlv ~u t a priKc. Mr Myers, for the respondent, cited antmrnies to ,l,«w that in Australia as well as New Zealand pak-a-poo had been held to be a lottery. The Court intimated that there \w no validii.y in the lonteution that the name ol the purchaser of the ticket should Have been staled. .Mr Chapman replied briellv. .Imkmonl was m served.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070720.2.12.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 20 July 1907, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
140PAK-A-POO. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 20 July 1907, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in