Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

■» , ATTORNEV.<)R\KRAI/S SUGGES-' '"" TIONB CRITICISED. Per Press Association. " ■ Auckland, Juno 20, the proposnl of the Attorney-General to submit a Hill dealing with the judicial system of the country W a» referred to by several prominent members of the Auckland Bar to-day in order to ascertain their view. Mr. Tkos. Cotter described the proposal ns "simply atrocious." "it is carrying centralising to a. most extra limit, und reducing all Supreme Courts of the colony, other than that of Wellington, to mere appendages to the Supreme Court in Wellington, and increasing the probable injurious «f. fetts of delays In getting cases heard 'S to such an extent as to seriously impair " thi' efficiency of our judicial system." Air. Karl, president of the Law Society, supported Mr. Colter. "The proposal," he said, "will be most bitterly op|»sed by the Auckland Law Society. I am quite satisfied that there will be a material increase in the cost of litigation, and the effect would bo generally hurtful to everyone except to the members of the legal profession at Wellington. The Law Society in Auckland lias alrcady.objectcd to lengthy absences of the Judge from this district, particularly when he is compelled to take Gisbome sittings. I can hardly suppose It is seriously in- • tended that one Judge shall take the whole circuit of the North Island, and tint an important centre like Auckland shall be left without a resident Judge. The practical effect of that would bo that nearly all Supreme Court business would have to paw through Wellington, much to the profit of the members of the legal profession there, but to the loss of Auckland practitioners and * clients." . , . i'S

Mr. A. Harina considers the proposal a retrograde step. Thero should be a Judge constantly sitting here, and he says a new sub-division of the colony should be made to include places like Napier, New Plymouth, Gisbome, 'and Palmcrston North.

The Appeal Court should be presided over by three Judges sitting constantly. Dean Bamford nlso spoke strongly against the proposal. It would increase the cost of law business, and also greatly delay it. He favored the creation of I three districts for the North Island with resident Judges. *

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070621.2.10.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 21 June 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
365

OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 21 June 1907, Page 2

OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 60, 21 June 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert