Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE NAVAL AGREEMENT.

i Sydney, May 10. ) The Herald says: "The -scheme u naval defence submitted tu the Impcria -' Conference requires ilia gr<;;ilost consul - eration. While the system of por, de ,' fence would lie admirable it would be :t .' 1110-1 inefficient substitute for the Auk I traliau squadron. it was plain iron Lord Tw.'edmoiith'a reply ilint tile Ad i' iniralty would .lie verv glad to net rid o ■ tile agreement with Australia and X-;-, i Zealand. Sir .1. li. Ward Ins wiseli I Stuck to the old agroemenLlhoiigli !i< Admiralty -bowed itself ppifcclly will in;: to let New Zealand oi{t, of the' bar gain as well n< Au-tralin." The Telegiaph says that New Z.-il'.>-,-will now be left by the Commonwealth and must make her own bargain. Tlial is a conspicuously weak feature of the new arrangement. , Received 10th. 11.5.1 p.m. Loudon, May Id. t The Admiralty estimate, since flu 1 concurrence of ..he colonial Parliament:. , is necessary, they will await forma , communications from the colonial (io ', veriinients before giving ell'ecl to Ci; new decision respecting the AusliMiku I agreement. Received 11th, 10.40 a.m.--Melbourne, Mav li), j Sir J. Forrest, referring lj the dec: cision of 1 lie Imperial ('.'(inference le [ terminate the naval agreement, tliouaht the old agreement exoellem, bill tlia, was not to say that sonic other, such :f|. .Mr Deihin proposed, was even betI ter. Personally, he preferred that it should run its course imMI it expired l.v the ellluxioti of time, as the machinery and training were just p-cltim' info working order. It was never intended h\- Mr -lleakin or Hie (iovernnient to iniercfere with tin- agreement, but ho position had been changed by the Imperial (iovernment. which was >o anxious for the agreement in 1!)02. Jl was impossible to say till Jfr Doakin returned what would be done, or when the present system would terminate Tile tiirilV i|iic tion would hay,, such'a prominent pl-ico next s-ssin,, tllflt it »",'.'>- be incomenien. ■ • |„, beerinning to ilcil w,ih the lie-,-: ,o-,.,|j 0 „

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070511.2.11.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 11 May 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
332

THE NAVAL AGREEMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 11 May 1907, Page 2

THE NAVAL AGREEMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume L, Issue 59, 11 May 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert