Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUDIT OFFICE ERROR

AliUl'X Xl5O OUT. TAKANAKJ COINXY IWXCIL U! iJI-X'TiS. A special nieeling of t|,e Xaranaki County Council was held fin Momlav to pass the half yearly balance sheei. whicii iiad been "tagged'' as usual. The Audit UDice ler.bel ran as follows: "Uxainiiied. and found correct, except as follows: Separate account numbered I is charged with more than the amount of money provided for i,. Tie; special rate which was made, and which it was necessary lo levy over a portion of the district to secure the. J'.llhain road loan of Uiitiiiii S/S was not collected lo a suHieient amount to pay the interest. (Note.—A similar exception appeared 011 the balancesneet Of ]|)()li.) Special rates amount,mg;- to £lOl 15/U applicable onlv to tne payment of interest on loans 'have lieen unlawfully used for oilier purjHKCN." L

I'll"! third exception, lie said,. «-as in'•"rrcel for U] r,.-, 7/s ] av - j„ t | l( . h . l||k ll «- erclit of (he bridge loan ac"lUNt. Tllis was (.he only loan account l>e kept as a separate ae counl. The Auditor (ieneral inlcinl't seemed, (0 take these rxcep; i„„s K 'l long as (ho Gounod had an ovcidi'alt a( tile banlc, evidently hol.line tmit , there was aD overdraft ilio nlereM Uiusf, liiive been used illegally. 1 U:|i •' ™'y fi»e pniiil. 'n, is ~x. ccption, however, could ~iil\ IIUrl lUr ''leuce (~ the ,-Cli 8/1. ihe credit „( , |,e -I'ariki Special rai", lie wroie to the Department ami the replv was to (he ellrel dm I, (hough (lie li ; .|l|-e, nii.dit be u-ron K . thai could not nll'ecf '(he "Ini'l'ils" of tile CNeeplion. Cl-. Steven- moved thai the balance sheet be not pis-cd lllllil j| had lieen ''.V II"' Audiloi- (,'eneral in such a way thai it would „„(; be misleading- (n (he ratepayers. < r. Iloj^ou Tll, ' eliaii'inan said thai now (hat (lie Council had slarlcd to <-<>!!,.,•; (lie separate rates, (he .\ndit n.-parlnicnl; was makiii.e- more fuss llian under (ne dill svslciii of ill,.gaily |Mvin»- the Kir Uiain and Tariki loan iiitercsl „„( „( '(lie ecnera'i accoiiul. I Tin- motion was earrieil, incinbcrs deciding (o ''baitle if olll,"

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19070207.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVIII, Issue 81918, 7 February 1907, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
347

AUDIT OFFICE ERROR Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVIII, Issue 81918, 7 February 1907, Page 2

AUDIT OFFICE ERROR Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVIII, Issue 81918, 7 February 1907, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert