ARBITRATION COURT AWARDS
COUfiT'S DUTY RESPECTING LUMP SUMS. TEH PRESS ASSOCIATION. Wellington, November 6. At a sitting of tho Arbitration Court to-day in the case of Hughes t. the tJnion S.S. Company, in which the company expressed its willingness to pay the balance due in a lump sure, .vlr Justice Chapman said that where the payments of 11 lump sum were concerned it was the duty of the Court to investigate the matter of investment. Counsel said the money would go in. J maintaining Hughes and nis family. Mr Justice Chapman reiterated his View that it was tho duty of the Court to enquire into the nature of the investments wheneyer any were to be made in respect of lump sums by way of compensation.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19061107.2.10.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81883, 7 November 1906, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
125ARBITRATION COURT AWARDS Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81883, 7 November 1906, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in