INTERPRETATION OF A WILL.
CASE BEFORE THE APPEAL COURT. ' '■ Per P.res? Association. Wellington, October 9. In the case, St. Hill and another y. St. Hill, to determine the meaning of certain provisions of the will of Ashton St. Hill (decoased), argument was no! concluded when the Appeal Court rose.. In 18SG St. Hill and his wife had separated, and he covenanted 10 pay her an annuity. In 1807 he substiiuted a deed, that in tho event of h : s wife surviving him, his executors should pay her £SOOO. In igoi testator directed that a legacy of ,63000 be given u> his wife i n lieu of die annuity. The question is whether the legacy of ,63000 was in addition *0 .63000 covenanted or not.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19061010.2.13.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81861, 10 October 1906, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
124INTERPRETATION OF A WILL. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81861, 10 October 1906, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in