Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PRFERENCE PROPOSALS

LATEBT. CABLE NEWS.

UMITIO PUSS ISSOCUTIOX —iir IUtCTIIC TBXBOBArj.—COPTBIOHT.

ENGLISH PRESS OPINION. A "THANKS FCR NOTHING" KECKPTION. Received 2, 143 p.m. Lokdos, September 1. The " Daily ChronicU " declares the essence of Mr Deaidn's preference proposal is a farther instalment of protection for Australian manufacturer!. In most of tbe lines affected by the offer, the (rreat bulk of trade is already in British hands. In return for a small and doubtful benefit, Britain is asked to alter her fiscal ■yitem and tax the bulk of Ler trade in order to give preference to the smaller part. It is nnreasonihle to uk a price out of all proportion to the benefits received. The " Manchester Guardian " contends that Australia gives avray nothing. Of Colonial sacrifice, there is not thi faintest trace on the globe. It declares At Deakin's offer is a distinct step onward in the cause of Imperial tariff reform, bnt it is not an offer of concession itself.

CANADIANS DISSATISFIED. Received 2, 4.43 p.m. Ottawa, September 1. Canadians are disappointed with Mr Deakin's scheme of British preference, placing the products of tbe Dominion on the same footing as those of America. AN ALT.-KOUND OPPONENT. Beceived 3rd, 1 a.m. MiLBorESE, September 2. The * Argus" regards Mr Deakin's preference lo Britain as unimportant, and little better than mockery. In regard to New Zealand, the paper says, our farmers most pay in every ease, ftid there is no lowering of duties in favour of New Zealand. The manufacturers in New Zealand deliberately Itood out of Federation, an I asks why should Tasmania, which came in, surrender to New Zealand all tha ns.-al advantages gained. AN AUSTRALIAN SUPrOKTEK. FAVORS ALSO NEW ZEALAND TREATr. Beceived 3,1.4 a.m. Melbocene, September 2 The " Age " applauds preterenc to Britain, and looks upon the New Zealand scheme as a noleable departure in the direction of Imperial unity. The treaty gives reciprocal advantages, and creates a new bond between the Commuwealth and the sister coloay.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19060903.2.16.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81838, 3 September 1906, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
327

THE PRFERENCE PROPOSALS Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81838, 3 September 1906, Page 3

THE PRFERENCE PROPOSALS Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 81838, 3 September 1906, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert