SUPREME COURT.
I'EH THESS ASSOCIATION. Nelso.v, March 27. After a four day's trial in the Supreme Court, before a special jury, the action Corry v. W. E. Clouston and Co. Ltd., concluded to-night. The issues put were -. Did plaintiff disobey the order and direction of defendant company iu tho purchase of chaff, if so, was tho company justified iu dismissing plaintiff on that ground ; was the defendant company justified in disiniss:.j,fplal»tifiJ(tf-iil(--ceuduct at Havclockj were defendants Justified in dismissing plaintiff on both grounds; what damage, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover ?
The jury found in the affirmative on all but the last. N.IPIEB, March' 27. In the Supreme Court to-day, a civil action Cheeseman Bros, against John Allleck, to compel the specific performance of an agreement to sell land and also for damages in connection with failure to do this; was heard, judgment being given for plaintiffs for £2l damages, and an order given for the specific performance of the agreement. X divorce case Wall v. Wall was adjourned owing to the illness of the petitioner.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19060328.2.11.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8070, 28 March 1906, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
176SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8070, 28 March 1906, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in