NO-LICENSE LIQUOR LAW.
CHAItGES DISMISSED. riil! PRESS ASSOCIATION. AsitßUiiTON, February 1. At the Magistrate's Court the case ngaiu.it the Timuru Brewery, churged with sending a package of beer into a no-license district without a statement attached, describing the nature of tke contents, was dismissed. The Magistrate defined a package as something containing liquor, the actual appearance of which did not give any indication of its contents. Such a doubt could not be raised in regard to a ten gallon keg of beer which, iu his opinion, was not a package, within the provision of the Act. Hie eases against Shand and Co charged with selling liquor, being aware it was being sent l.i a no-license district, and failing to I'.i.w.ird a statement to the authorities, nul also with failing to attach a statement to the same showing the nature of the eontents, was dismissed, the Magistrate holding there was no evidence to show the firm knew that the purch \ner, who bmght (ho whisky in Christchuivh. was going to take it into a no-licens,' district.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19060203.2.13.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8044, 3 February 1906, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
175NO-LICENSE LIQUOR LAW. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 8044, 3 February 1906, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in