Control of the Foreshore.

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7957, 21 October 1905, Page 2

Control of the Foreshore.

KItOSION UK TIIK CLll'l.'.S. ~.T h* '\ l ;! v «»' it. Cock) . u „. I '■'V , ( waitul on Hi'H ffarlioiir I'.oard on I' l-iiiiiy as a 'ilcpnial ii n on (H-half <,f >" 1...i-oHf,,h Council |„ ask thai con- '/" 01 thu ''"''••shor,., H. lie vested in Lini, 1 ' I '!', i,,i, iniini.it |Jia |, * ( """ cll 'desired -1,, take WlVctjve. sW.ps l<> check tlu, sveioits ~r „ s itm OI 111., clilis opposite (.'over .Street as tin; Hmwi<>ltiin.»( ~r the w . a liecouiin- alarming. 'l'll,. IW,| apparently look-n„ interest in tiiis necessar.v work. The vx(f ,, skm 0 , tile esplanade was also a work that would probably. receive altcnlirii later on liy Ihe Council. 'p|,.- Coun-j Cil, ll'. 'asking, (or Ilic foreshore, liail J no desire („ make any prolil out of I the sialic ami ironsand 'deposits, of' which I lie Board] coul'tl retain con i 1 ro '- I'egnrd to t| u . surges Ho it' thai the matter would devolve on, the, Oovermiiont if the new railwat deviation were made along the cliffs the .Mayor said that some believed] the route would ire more in the (j.j_ red ion of Duller Street. j The Town' Clerk, in ivplv in „| ipiest ion. said thai if Ihe Hoard was agrecalile to trausfei .he il-M [ not I liink I here would ain 1.,.al dilliciilly, hut a formnl liill tlirougii I rarliiinienl uould he ueci'ssarx. 'l'll- liuynl ilci'crix-cl cyiMsiUmttioy