ARBITRATION COURT.
KAIAPOI WOOLLEN COMFAKY. DISPUTE, (Per Press Association.) CHIUSTCUUHCH, June 13. At the Arbitration Court to-do}', Augustus Nixon, a carpenter, mm "fined £2 for employing a nooHinionist when' there were ?lno unionists on the books of tho Union. For paying: less than the minimum wages, the' following were fined: Alex. lUuch £2, Y. M. steel £8 and ordered to pay back wages for eight, weeks. Craddock and Orr £lO. The Talloresscs' Union charges U»< Kaiupoi Woollen Company with employing a larger proportion of an»prerrtices to operatives than tto award allowed. Counsel for the csn>pany said he had no legal defence to,offer, but unless the company couWi employ more apprentices It could not cope w»Ui tho output of tho mill., which would have to be closed down. The company, with" the concurrence of" tho Union, had hail to send to Sydney for operatives, Counsel for tho' Union contended the arrangement was only temposary. and part of the complalat was], that local girtehad duiilng tho period when operatives wcko alleged to be ujtowalnafele, been given holidays, which was]' practically oqfual' to dismissal, ttv Court reserved judgment. . " :
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19050613.2.21
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7847, 13 June 1905, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
185ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7847, 13 June 1905, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in