Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Slattery Case.

AN AFPEAL. (Hcceived May 20, 1,5 a.m.) SYDNEY, May 19. The hearing has commenced before the Full Court of an appeal oa behalf / of T. M. Slnttery. The grounds of" a|>pcal aro that Slatiery wa« not bailee''of Mrs Scanlon's money, tor. the larceny of which he wus Mateoecd, but only her banker, and that tho previous civil proceedings prevented criminal proceedings being t*i ken on the same facts. 1 Mr Jack Want argued that tin < itionoytres a dcbl from Htattcry to ' Mrs Scanlon, and there could be no larceny of o debt, that when he paid the amounts into his overdraft account became the bank's money. Whut he drew was not. equivalent to Mrs Scanlon's money, but was a, loan by the bank,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19050520.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7827, 20 May 1905, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
126

The Slattery Case. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7827, 20 May 1905, Page 2

The Slattery Case. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7827, 20 May 1905, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert