Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Supreme Court.

Toe tri-annual sessions of the Supreme Court wore Concluded on Thursday 'before Mr. Justice Edwards* —Possession and Damages.— His Honour gave judgment in the also of Mai-giaret O'Shea v. ./. .1. Sommei',4, claim for iHiHsesxion of certain land near KlUiuiu, and £">o sonifiensatlon for lohs of prof lis on the farm sinco ,liiiiuni'\ 9, when dv - - fendaiit had ieceivt.l notice to mill. His Honour made an order for po.'.sossion of the land, and allowed mesne prolils £B, with counsel's Ire, £5 os and Cotiii costs. j IX CHAAHIKHS. ! I Mr llnuliiii movrd liiiiler seclion 82 of '■• The Deeds ltejfit.l ration Act, 1808," that authority %e jriicn to I register copies 'of iiistrinutnts (ai>pended; insteaid ut \h.- oi'igiimis .n the same manner as tke ori«:nuls might be negotiated :—(lj Succes-i Kion order of the Native Land Court made on February 'J2nd, 1870, n|>Jtointing Uawera I'iripi successor to Atuinu (dvevaAHl) in sections lit) and •>l, Una district,; und (2) rfmilar upplicution apiKMiiting Amaruaiihu Ru,wi«,n and IMpi successors to the estalo of Kawera l'iripi. _ The order | was made accordingly. Itotlierv Umusay.'of Kltham (for «no,„ Ml . Koy mu(lo I.hcßtion for T. U. Crump, solicitor, i>i Milium, to show cause why two bil.s ot costs (£1 4s and £BB lis _d) rendeaid by Uie Ho ' the applicant, should not be referred I to the Registrar of the Court for taxation on the ground that the I charges were excessive ; that rosponI dent should be restrained from ~r o. sveuting any action toucnlng the dtnjund ; aud that the respondent puv SS? rr^L 8 ?. f t™"* l procetdhia;. ™!„ rf . ..i w,ton "PP l '""-" 1 for respondent. The application was gran,ted, the matter of costs i 0 lie sett'Jed .according to the result «: the Reffistiar's taxation. * Mr Mulonc, who appeared for U re I defendant m the uctioiv „f Do*.-,* lot tow damages, moved that Iplaintiff tile and servo more explicit particulars 0 f stntemont of olaiu*. \'nv order was made, and costs £2 .2s attached to the action. I On the application of Mr lUighes, letters of udni.imiKtPation ill re .tames [Wdwurd Sni'ten (deceased, Intestate), j were granted to James HarU-n, la■ther and next of kin of deceased.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19050310.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7759, 10 March 1905, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
362

Supreme Court. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7759, 10 March 1905, Page 2

Supreme Court. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVII, Issue 7759, 10 March 1905, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert