Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPERIAL PALIAMENT.

THE SOUTH AFRICAN CAMPAIGN . LONDON\ Feb. 5, Mr RcfJson, Literal member for South Shields, in moving an amendment ' to the Address-in-Ueply, dwelt on the absence of a plan of campaign in South Africa, lie »aid the blunders were due to the Ministry and not to the soldiers. The Right Hon. G. Wyndiyun (Chief' Secretary for Ireland), replying, practically repeated Sir Balfour's speech at the United Club. He contended that munitions and provisions would have sufficed for a force of seventy-live thousand had tho estimate been correct, luut the Government awl all its military ad,visers had therein errod. Tho Government case.rested on the report of the Commissioners., Mr Chamberlain, in a strenuous speech, ,guot«d Sir H. CampbeilBancernuan's declaration three months prior to the war that military preparations wene unnecessary, and he asked How could the lioers be expected to qome to terms thinking if they refused we would not make preparations; or that if wo did we would be condemned by the Opposition. Sir H. Campfbell-Bannerman, Leader of the Opposition, speaking to Mr Robson's amendment, stated that on June 20th, 1899, Mr Qivamjbierlain came to his room and asked H the Opposition would join hi sending -.10,,000 troops to the Oape, and declared that there would t* no figibtiiig, tho Government being only engaged in a giame of bluff. He (Sir H. Campbeil-Banueruian) refused on/the ground that the responsibility of sending troops rested with the ExecutiveMr ChairfSerial7i, i a reply, said he had no recollection of the word bluff," and it was u»likely he used it. He told Sir H. , Campbell Bamnerman that there was not the slightest prdbitfjility then of war twt it was dusiraible to impress th* Boers with the fact that Great Britain was in earnest. THE ADDRESS-IN-REPLY. (Received Fob. 7, 0.22 a.m.) LONDON, Eeb. 0. Mr Rcfcson's amendment to the Ad-dress-in-Roply was negatived by 378 votes to 192. (Received Feb. 8,1.14 a.m.) LONDON, Feb. 7. Fifty-four Nationalists voted for Mr Kobson's amendment. The Times considers Sir 11. Camp-beli-Bannerman himself supplies conelusive justification for the delay which occurred in sending reinforcements to the Transvaal.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19040208.2.19.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 32, 8 February 1904, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
348

IMPERIAL PALIAMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 32, 8 February 1904, Page 3

IMPERIAL PALIAMENT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XLVI, Issue 32, 8 February 1904, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert