Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LICENSING MATTERS.

0 U«r OF APPEAL. PBE PRESS ASSOCIATION. Wellington, July 10*.** On the Court resuming, the Chief Justice intimated that His Honor Judgo Ocop°r was unable to leave his bed, and the hearing of the licen'iog cbsjs would bo adj turned till Monday'. The Loan and Mercantile v. Reed was al-.o adjourned in consequence of Judge Cooper's illness. Counsel, Mr H. D. Bell, siid, as it seems improbable the case oan be heard this sitting, arrangements will be made, if possible, to hold a special session of tbe Court for the purpose. The motion for leave to appeal to tbe Privy Council in the Chalmers licensing case was then taken, Mr T. 8* Weston appearing for the motion and Mr Adams in opposition. Tee Court intimated that prima foci* there seemed to be a right to appeal, and it would therefore hear Mr Adams • first. Mr Adams mentioned as a preliminary objection that the statement before the Court of appeal, that Mr Graham was specially appointed chairman of the Fore Chalmers Licensing Committee, was now admitted to be a nv'stak?, and he applied to have the affidavit correcting it admitted among the p»p*rs of the ease. After considerable discussion the point was held over to enable consent of the other pirties to the amendment to be obtained. Mr Adams then proceeded to argue that the case did not cosae within tbe terms of the Order-in-Oocnoil authorising the Couit to grant leave to appeal; no property, or right to property, being involved, and no right that could be reduced to a money va'ue. Mr Adams urged that the right involved is not the right to have licensee; but merely to inquire into the validity of the p ill. The Court must not assume, if the decision was reversed, that licenses would bo issued, for even if the poll was declared invalid, it wu not yet settled that licenses could be granted. Mr T. S. Weston for the other side contended that the value of the licenses involved was far above tbe £SOO mentioned in the Order in Counoil. It was sufficient that if the decision was reversed, the poll could be attacked, and might be declared invalid. Decision was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19030711.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 161, 11 July 1903, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

LICENSING MATTERS. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 161, 11 July 1903, Page 2

LICENSING MATTERS. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 161, 11 July 1903, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert