Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ELINGAMITE INQUIRY.

DIOISION OF THE COURT. PER PRESS ASSOCIATION. Auckland, January 19. The judgment of "he Court appointed to inquire into tf:e loa- of Mfssr.-i Huddart Paiker and CompanyV steimer Elingamite on the Three King's, was given this morning. The Court was of opinion that there was no grounding astern until aftor the vessel struck. Toe engineer* all told the same story, advanced the same j theory, and showed the same reluci taece to speak rar didiy about the i engines. , It was cleir that owing to [gome defect in the engines'reversing gear, they would not ac', and thus a chance of saving the vessel was lost. Satisfactory as the testimony of the engineers was, the Court could not held the surviving engineers roepjusible for what happened. The Court, found that Ciptain Attwood was guilty of grossly negligent navigation in diiving at fall speed through the fog, when he must have known that he was near the lacd ; in negli cting to take soundings before altering the couree; in proceeding at knots without Founding; and in not carefully ascertaining the speed.

The Court also found tbat after the wreck, a grave error of judgment was committed by Captain Attwood in allowing No. 1 boat to leave with only hilf her completement.

I The master and the firs'; officer were ' blamed f r not having the boats properly equipped and tackl'd, and for the fact tbat the crew were not effic : eot in | boat drill. | The officers should have kept the boite and rafts together until a concerted plan of action was agreed upon. While the certificated of the first and second officers must; be returned, thsir conduct was not commendable, either in handling the boats, or in leaving the passengers adrift on the rafts. Captain Attwoed's certificate was suspended for a year, and he was ordered to pay £SO towards the co*& of the inquiry. Referring to the experience ef tLo*e on the rafts, the Court exprers°d the opinion that there was no foundation for any charge of unnatural conduct, though the survivors had gone through as much as men could and live.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19030120.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 16, 20 January 1903, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
353

ELINGAMITE INQUIRY. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 16, 20 January 1903, Page 3

ELINGAMITE INQUIRY. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXV, Issue 16, 20 January 1903, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert