CARTERTON LIBEL CASE.
AN INTERESTING QUESTION. DISTRICT JUDGES AND M.'s.H.R. PKB PRESS ABSOOIATMX. Wblunqton, June 26. The Carterton libel cases of Horneby ▼. Moriarty, and Moriarty v. Horasby, ware men'ioned in the District Oourt at Mastirt n this morning Course! for Kornsby sppli d f r an adjourrment oa th« ground of parliimentary privil 'ge Tbis was objected to. Mr, District Judge Ktt'le said that as District Oourt Judges were not independent, be would d'e ine to heir a cise ia which a member of Pailiament was concerned, he being dependent for his sahiy upon tbe LegisUture. He advised that a writ of certiorari be obtained to remove the cares in'o the Supieme Court. Counsel for Moiiarty Slid be would apply for a mandamus to compel Judge Kettle to adjudicate.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19010627.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 130, 27 June 1901, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129CARTERTON LIBEL CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 130, 27 June 1901, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in