ARBITRATION COURT.
PUB PEKSB ASSOCIATION. Christchurch, Miy 1, Evideace on behalf of the Union in (he bjotmakert, depute is cjncluiod. Three p-jiuts of difference will bj submitted to the Court. The first it whether the rongh stuff department la to be imludtd in the award; th* second is in regard to wages; and the third relttes to the hours per wceki * In ti thi stuff departni n'. the must- is h.tve agieed to in« elude under the heading, of skilled artisans 1 hos) mgugel in stle tutting,** • bu ', 10'. in o'her branches of tbe d«paitmeir. The employers say th?y < c nn t pay the minimum wase of £2 10s hrl<o' for, ant that aho t ning the tiuuvt) wuuli uju e w.e industry.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19010502.2.17
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 87, 2 May 1901, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
123ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXIII, Issue 87, 2 May 1901, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in