Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CONINGHAM DIVORCE CASE.

[PRB PBKBB ASBSOIATIOS.] {Received 16, 12.14 p.m.) Sidney, March 14. in the Cfoiagbwa CMe Mr - MoM rWxolici'.or wbo "ted for petitioner it ttKiJast case, produced a written state Mont sent by the petitioner forravjsioi by hit w.f =» as to the evidence ha was t( get and give at the former tr«a'. Veil tioner aa.l respondent had both deciec the t-xistenw of the p»peis and th< petitioner oxplained the denial by stat xn? that Moss had told him all p»pen bad b-*n tern up. Ths Mass d.nied The r< spnndent when sh »n the paper i B iid he had never seen them before oi Bjfide the alterations thereim. Toe cross-examination of responded is concluded,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19010316.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXIII, Issue 50, 16 March 1901, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
118

THE CONINGHAM DIVORCE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXIII, Issue 50, 16 March 1901, Page 3

THE CONINGHAM DIVORCE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume XXXXIII, Issue 50, 16 March 1901, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert