Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARKING CASE DECISION.

In a reserved judgment valid throughout New Zealand, Mr J. H. Luxford, S.M., held, at Wellington yesterday, that an offence against .he Motor 'Regulations in regard to keeping fire plugs clear arises only when the driver or the person in fhiarge completes the operation of stopping or parking, and such person s not responsible if an unauthorised person subsequently moves the vehicle into the prohibited area. If the transport authorities had intended otherwise they had failed to express that intention. He dismissed two chaiges, being satisfied that some ns else moved the cars to make oom or to enable him to drive away.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370630.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 460, 30 June 1937, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
106

PARKING CASE DECISION. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 460, 30 June 1937, Page 4

PARKING CASE DECISION. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 460, 30 June 1937, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert