Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"Taranaki Central Press” MONDAY, MAY 3, 1937. THE “HAVES” AND "HAVE-NOTS"

The fiction that Germany is being starved for raw materials has been referred to frequently by publicists in recent months, and the universal conclusion of impartial controversialists is that the want of colonies in no way induces the slow starvation suggested by Nazi spokesmen. The latest contribution to the debate is that of Sir Robert Horne, a former President of the Board of Trade and Chancellor of the Exchequer. He points out that Germany in 1936 had a favourable trade balance with Great Britain of £1 1,000,000, and with the Dominions of £12,000,000, the inference being that she is well able to meet her requirements without overseas sources of supply.

The point is made that Great Britain does not control her Dominions, but has to pay for what she gets and the same course it open to Germany.

It is a principle of business that it is easiest to buy in a countiy in which you sell, and there is no reason in the world why any country in existence should starve because she is denied colonies. It could probably be shown that in pre-war years the raw materials for industry and military preparation in Germany were obtained ir Allied countries, and it is conceivable that no restriction has been placed on her purchases since the Treaty of Versailles came into operation, provided she had the money to pay for what she wanted.

Japan and Italy have achieved the dimensions of leading Powers while suffering the same disadvantage as that of which Germany complains. The value of overseas territory to a country is dependent on the possibility of development on civilised principles.

The moral support of Canada, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand to Great Britain may be inestimable, but they live on her bounty as expressed in terms of trade, whereas she might obtain the same articles in a cheaper market if she dealt with foreigners.

There may be some dignity in being surrounded with young nations owing allegiance to a parent in Europe, but when they are .uninhabitable by white man and offer only limited opportunities for industrial development they are more a liability than an asset. I hat seems to sum up the opinions of those who have given to the public the fruits of their profound study of the subject, and it certainly disposes of the idea which has gained currency as a result of Germany s persistent propaganda that to obtain raw materials it is necessary to possess independent sources of supply.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370503.2.11

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 423, 3 May 1937, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
428

"Taranaki Central Press” MONDAY, MAY 3, 1937. THE “HAVES” AND "HAVE-NOTS" Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 423, 3 May 1937, Page 4

"Taranaki Central Press” MONDAY, MAY 3, 1937. THE “HAVES” AND "HAVE-NOTS" Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 423, 3 May 1937, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert