Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"Taranaki Central Press” SATURDAY, MAY 1, 1937. BELGIUM’S INDEPENDENCE.

A few months ago the King of Belgium laid it down that his country’s policy must be “exclusively and entirely Belgian” and resolutely aimed “at placing us outside the disputes of our neighbours.” Though it was immediately explained that the King’s words defined an ideal direction and di 4 not signify a rejection of treaty commitments, it was soon clear that Belgium was, in fact, anxious to escape from the obligations wh ch, after the German denunciation of the Locarno agreements, were renewed by France, Great Britain, and Belgium about a year ago; and once this was clear, the end was certain. Belgium’s anxiety to free herself was due, of course, to the unilateral nature of the agreement patched together from the Locarno fragments. The original agreements were an all-in guarantee □ f security. The new engagements bound France, Great Britain, and Belgium in a virtual defensive alliance against Germany. It might have been imagined that Belgium would welcome such a measure of provisional security against the likeliest danger of aggression; but for two reasons, chiefly, Belgium preferred to disentangle herself. First, Belgium distrust of France has increased as French security arrangements have extended, to Russia and to Czechoslovakia, and have widened the frontier of Belgium’s military risk. Second, being committed in this one-sided way. Belgium could not help considering the less responsible state of Holland, Denmark, and Switzerland, or even Norway and Sweden, and envying them their independency Behind this consideration, probably, was another: that Belgium was more likely to obtain a separate guarantee of security from Germany while uncommitted to France and Great Britain than while committed. There may even have been a wiser, more generous, and al the same lime more practical hone: that a new Western pact would be more likely to take shape if Belgium eased the Rhine frontier grouping of the parties concerned. / Whether Belgium has really achieved anything for herself or for Europe by moving France and Great Britain to absolve her from all special obligations is, however, far from certain.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370501.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 422, 1 May 1937, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
346

"Taranaki Central Press” SATURDAY, MAY 1, 1937. BELGIUM’S INDEPENDENCE. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 422, 1 May 1937, Page 4

"Taranaki Central Press” SATURDAY, MAY 1, 1937. BELGIUM’S INDEPENDENCE. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 422, 1 May 1937, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert