Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“Taranaki Central Press” THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 1937. BILBAO BLOCKADE.

The cable messages relating to the blockade of Bilbao by I the Spanish insurgents seem to be very confused. General Franco’s announcement that he intended to prevent food cargoes from entering the port of Bilbao is apparently quite in order, for he is entitled to establish a blockade, even though from a British point of view his force is purely an insurgent one. The conditions to be observed are that the blockade must be effective and that it must be impartial. A single warship may maintain an effective blockade of one port, but it would be open to argument whether one cruiser could maintain, an “effective j blockade of any considerable stretch of coast. The point of importance in the present instance arises un- j der Articles 1 and 9of the Blockade Rules adopted in 1909, | which provide that the declaration must specify the geographical ’ limits of the coastline under blockade and that the blockade must ! not extend beyond the ports and coasts belonging to or occupied ‘ by the enemy. Apparently the British intention is to pin the I rebel warship to the immediate vicinity of Bilbao and to see that | it does not intercept British ships on the high seas. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact and it seems to be obvious enough that a single warship could not possibly maintain an effective blockade if it were operating at any appreciable distance from the port affected, because by no stretch of imagination could one cruiser be regarded as a “sufficient force’’ under such conditions. A mere patrol is not a blockade. I On the other hand it seems to be stretching international law unduly to suggest, as one London journal does, that insurgent ships may not “interfere” with British ships on the high seas and that British warships would be entitled to open fire if the Almirante Cervera were to stop a merchantman outside territorial waters for the purpose of ascertaining its destination.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19370415.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 408, 15 April 1937, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

“Taranaki Central Press” THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 1937. BILBAO BLOCKADE. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 408, 15 April 1937, Page 4

“Taranaki Central Press” THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 1937. BILBAO BLOCKADE. Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 408, 15 April 1937, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert