Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

“Baby in Pram is Not A Pedestrian”

ENGLISH DOUBT PLEA LONDON. Here’s a new one for the Minister of Transport: "Is a baby in a pram, being pushed n a street, a pedestrian?” The problem arose at Hull, when s lorporation bus driver, accused of no (lowing free passage to pedestrians a i beacon crossing, was stated to b-tv his bus as a woman, pushing , perambulator, left the pavement. The woman admitted that she htv .ot actually left the pavement, and th' lefence was that the baby in th ierambulator was not a pedestrian. The summons was dismissed, despitt i claim by the police that the baby was a human being. “There is a holt m the regulations,” said the magis trate.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TCP19361201.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 300, 1 December 1936, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
122

“Baby in Pram is Not A Pedestrian” Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 300, 1 December 1936, Page 3

“Baby in Pram is Not A Pedestrian” Taranaki Central Press, Volume IV, Issue 300, 1 December 1936, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert