Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAKEFIELD MEETING.

To the Editor of the Colonist.

Sir—ln Wednesday's Examiner, I see a short letter from v correspondent, signed " Voter," endeavouring to insinuate that the vot's of confidence in Mr. Robinson, at Walcefield. was not carried unanimously,-as reported in last Tuesday's Colonist. '; • ■ "< I will not attempt to say how many hands were held up in support of it, as I do not believe any j>ersm could have counted th»m in the short time that they were held up. before hands " on the contrary." were called for; when, not a single hand appeared, and the chairman (Mr. B«igent) pronounced that th« resolution was earned unanimous)/; which decision was not called in question, even by a gentleman who had put some rather personal questions to Mr. Robinson, which were evidently answered much more satisfactorily than ho had ventured to hope'; especially, as Mr. Robinson, in the fnithful disoliarge of his duty, was once compelled to inform that gentleman, that he would " not tell him what the lowest tender was, so that ho could put in at the same price and get it." In a report of Mr. jßarnicoat's meetings, which appears in the same Eiaminer, I notice s>me very gross " inaccuracies upon matter of fact," but your limited space will only allow me to notice two. First, I read that at Waimea-west, ■' tho masting unanimously passed a vote of thanks for his manly exposition of hi* views." The meeting did nothi.ig of the sort—as I have already reported, Mr. Silcick, a well-known supporter of Mr. Robinson, (after waiting until a vote of thanks had been proposed to the chairman) proposed a vote of thanks to Mr.,.Barniuoat, but it was not seconded or put from the chair, nor did it elicit a single cheer, or any thing that would give the reporter to tho Examiner the slightest foundation for such an asaerfon. In proof of this, I can conn* lently appeal to Mr. Kerr, sun., who occupied tha eh ir. At Wnkefield. a similar proposition was male by Mr. Wratt, jun , a few faint' ayes,' given when called for by the chaii man, but as the wording of the resolution was considered objectionable, the chairman very prudently, did not ask for any " noas." 1 am, &c, : " t YQUH REPORTER.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18611220.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Colonist, Volume IV, Issue 434, 20 December 1861, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
377

WAKEFIELD MEETING. Colonist, Volume IV, Issue 434, 20 December 1861, Page 3

WAKEFIELD MEETING. Colonist, Volume IV, Issue 434, 20 December 1861, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert