RESIDENT MAGISTRAE'S COURT.
[Before J. Poynter, Esq., Resident ■• Magistrate.] . WEBN,|SJSAY,, .NoyjBMBE,R5 £ l^i:;i) };.-,;,;; , Thomas Alpori v. Benjamin Lusty., , # % £fy t} xe. value of a calf, the property of|co9ipla. n.f^»;'^' cl?' was found running on the liMsr at' t'^' ''b^'CK of -defendant's'hous^"""1 """'"""^'""" ■.-'.«.■.•••>--•■-•••■•'■•-■•"•«■>■■-■■ Thomas.j^,lpovt; (who appeared for Mi "s- AJpp.rt, r the complainant,, her husband'having;. ;^ rt th?. 'cb'lo'Hy) s^orri,:-' iioista-'steer calf,fsfrawberV 1 and'branded'Abu^the near l'-unip1, and)hear,/! pf its <. being seen on Mr. Lusty's, land,', ; ' : .. V,'...V.,, •' ■ ■ -;: Cross-examined : The 'calf belonged, to me h «forei •■ Henry .Alportjeft the colony.^, Tije,property, -was;' assigned to 'me hefqre my son left* '(The deeiJ -.ofassignment was handed,; to thQcanagfetrate for in- I spection.) ...;u! ■; ;:■:;;; : ■'"■''l
His Worship said'there was not sufficient evi^. deiice i.proiducecl ~by the plaintiff ta warrant '& decision in hisfavor;; on the«ontrary,"it vVas quite■•',' evident that this assignment had been ni'ade over, to the father for thd purpose of defrauding?the ere-; ditors, as was too often the case by persons Similarly circumstanced in this colony^ j 2eii shillings being the full amount oi the assighTnetiiiroi^thie v\vhole; of the property! ~ ;:,f' .'.'. ',; :;..-, Alfred Alport sw.qvn: Kn6w^thS.ca]?4n question. Searched'for'it'ahd'fbuiidlt op Mi'.,liustv'a ground. Demanded it, and' was ,r£f,iis(s : d.';. He' told me he would see me .... ~,./'.' .f^rsV,^ ;'".■'.' , : ; , ~: •, ; By the Magistrate": The <3alf fornierly;belonged;' to,,ray brother. -. Recollect,^the assignqient being"1 made; think it vvasaftetUie^^euvitheilagistrates'; Court,...had;, been decided, against ihim'.sbme time since. . */>■■ jfi--. \'-:.-> :. ..- ./r.;.- {■■■: :r. ;' " The Magistrate, in dismissing ithe case/Said t hat i lafiaudi had! been ■co'ihmitted.'i. For the Fake of a nominal sum (10s.) the properiy'hM been given away; and under these circumstaaces he should dismiss the.>ca'se,;'''the coiiiplaih'ant'ito pay costs. Mr. Kingdon, fdtthti'cbmplainan^said he should proceed against the. defendaut crimiua'lly. ' !
I' ' the toiirt ['.oji'trte, SlsitiO^qb'ei", £md,,resumecl } this day, and j after' conversation,pf,-'up,^ntere^tJft.ihe; reader, the Magistrate gave jiidgicnen't,' viz!, JSS, the value1 of lytheij.huljpck..-.-,.-;;.. iA ;;,, V/ t'-: : : ~. ■ :"• iniio::/ ;;;!•>:3 ' William.Jlavimessiiyi'] 'Mugh Martin, for £20, for use of;;a ; ;bullock .belpn'ging :tol plaintiff. T;he bullock was sold by auction\in September, 1856, and has been in possession -of defendantl ever since. To!recoy.er.,ss.::pev:>v£ek,for his keep. ; !, t! l\|r.., J (3onneil appeared for plaintiff, andii'fMi'A -Kingdon for defendant. ' ,; , f .. v ;.. y j \ L/Wv'Harkrtess swoi^n-:■''!AtiJ.' pliinfifr'iatliislactioh'l >and,liva in Riohmbncl Jhliprodjutse* the deed of is'w ';sig;nnient fr.onijMontague/Ellisf! dated' Mtli'-'^tiiy:^ 1856; produce also a list of the stock assjgned,'^iid:' the bullock,1 bra'Misd in^'uestfiori/- The butloclcy -was sold bythe;:^rust«es.tpjr:;the;b^uefi^pf.th^i^i>edt-''| ■V%:d'r^•/!"Ellft•lTadinbbV^nd : 6^h'^a^6^yrij':bhld one belong^'ifngito a;Charles';Woi!l HVas bori:o\Vedj \yiiich Was ; i ustid^p'side do *vfa;' ■ Found ; tlije bullock'aft^rvyarids: in' Mr; Martin& pos&ession abbut Jiily'last* 'dfemaitded ■possession, which was not.co-mplied with.: ] lt , pi!Qss;exaniinefV_:.,.)Vas/,de:njed,posses i sipn .ofshini'" ir"in "Aug'iist I"asl:,and'|slced'osp^ caitiriot i Bay wh^f'lfff'^h'rtiti's1 'aiiswer 'vvasl' 'j' knew iiej ; Jhad tliQ :^ee.n^^in:his 4eainj jwijtliin [ the 4t«slt }-tyfo?^ofitlk j\';>y6hV;ia' jo^,
seeing it in his team. Never advertised it, after inquiry-for it. When I saw it on Martin's ground 1 came on to Nelson, applied to Air. Ellis to know where the bullock was; was never told the bullock had been given in charge. ' "?, Re-examined: I paid for the bullock in questioi?; Charles Walker -sworn: Am a-farmer residing at Stoke; remember Mr. Harkness telling me had lost a bullock, and asked me to show himoncsthat used to be called Ellis's bullock ;, I branded;the bullock for Ellis; I showed Harkriessr'tlie bullock 'in Miv Martin's ground about a yeai' and'a half ago; had seen it before that time in Mr. Martin's possession; it has been on his groundever since it^ Had been'a calf. Have' seen "the" bulloclTair work" 'for Mr..'Powjck,'but cannot say'it waS [working for 'Mi1:-Martin 1; it was'a poley millddk. 1 * f ~-;:Cro3s-examined: It was a year-and a^half-agc that I showed it to Harkness. .Since J.branded it Jife has been running constantly 'orf' Mi*. Martin's "ground. '/ ' ' ' ■'•*-•• . John Cundy sworn: I live at Stoke, and am a laborer, know a bullock called Ellis's bullock, i: |pr .. ~fche lasfc. five years; it' is:ja poley bullock branded V |W ojii the off-side. \JOr|Martin lent it to'aiMp.;' ■ Powiciß |(WO years agp. | Another bullock was ' lent to Mr. Powick at the'same time, called-Star. .. Mr. f Kingdon, for the defendant, contended 1 tih^i'e'; was nofcase to proceed with, and proceeded "to'cali f Martin, w^ho i -b,eing|woi''ttt fattfril rejcejf^d th.c bjill6ck iia que^ti^|iwn|l^ JlUis and,. hi§ son Charles about five'years agb^'Kept it ; up'to^' !i; witlun the last eigliteen months, when I parted, ..iSp'M it; it now belongs to my son. rv *'pf.. broke it in. Never saw it advertised, and rid'de-1 [niandvwas made-fir ittuntil tljej: present time. A *few weeks since 'T !mfe't JMr." flarkness, and lie told me I had a. bullock belonging to him, meaning one of Mr. Ellis's bullocks; told him I had parted with^th^t'oneisbnTJqtitiie since. | ' T. 0.. Batcheldr sworn: Received £6 for the bullock, and ,that jjte my signature produced^; a creditor of Ellis1", never saw" one halfpenny, jbu^ ; twouldihaye beeq;glao| tg;have seen some. ! " 'I\-. '"■ "Andrew" Henders6ri,' sworn: Recollect a bullock,, Mm vMartinfc-'possession, branded CW; helped t'o^ break it in about two years and a half ago. ; rp . ~ rf ;This cloßedithe-!CaS6i6v;the:ide|enc^ iMft Eing-; >%6ri said He^iioultfidk-hii'Vorship^'el^fet giving a judgment4n4he case, as he had not had sufficient »' titaeto pay;that attention to the case it deserved"• he wouldproduce facts that would throw a different light on the .nia^tex. ~.-,.>, „ \ Ji'io t :-'l^Mmili MMtofaM® brouglit on the charge of ~drunkemjess,.. P! lmprisoned forty-eight hours,yfojO Being a nuisance to the public. \
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18601116.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Colonist, Volume IV, Issue 321, 16 November 1860, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
862RESIDENT MAGISTRAE'S COURT. Colonist, Volume IV, Issue 321, 16 November 1860, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.