SUMMARY.
(From the Home Neios, May 25.) The "great argument" has come to a sudden find most unexpected conclusion. Seldom has the House of Commons presented so remarkable an aspect as it did on the night, of the 21st of May, when the debate on My. Cardwell's vote of censure was to be resumed, and, as everybody hoped, concluded; Tile House was crowded in evavy part, a,id oven a s'ranger, ignorant of the cause of t he excitement, must have been deeply imp re.-ssed by the hush of intense expectation which pervaded that vast assembly. The occasion was one of unprecedented interest,'for it was not merely the fate of an Administration which hung upon the issue, but the momentous consequences which the decision of the House of Commons, either way, might exert upon the population of Oude, if not upon the whole conflict in which we are engaged. As the hour approached for the opening of the discussion, it became apparent that an extraordinary change was passing over the spirit of the House. Never was there such an imbroglio of parties. All the old sectional ties seemed to have been rent assunder. Many members who were anxious to support Lord Canning from personal and political motives, and who were, in a measure, pledged to do so, could not by any effort of sophistry reconcile themselves to the proclamation. The terms of Mr. Cardwell's motion, no doubt, liberated thenconsciences in some degree, by declining to pronounce any judgment in the absence of explanation : but unluckily the correspondence between the Governor-General and Sir James Outram had been laid before the House that morning, and thus removed the grounds upon which that portion of the motion rested. ■ Sufficient information was in the hands of all members to deprive them of the last shred of a mental pretext for not forming an opinion upon the policy of " confiscation." The perplexity arising out of this state of circumstances shattered the hitherto compact body of Lord Canning's supporters into fragments, oscilating amongst a multitude of expedients. In other quarters the confusion was equally bewildering. Mr. Bright and Mr. Milner Gibson, and their small knot of adherents, were with the Government; and on that side,, also was to be found the trenchant sarcasm of Mr. Roebuck. The crumbling roliques of the Peel party were for the first time divided among themselves, and while Mr. Cardwell threw his weight into the scale of the Liberal section over which Lord Palmerston presided, Sir James Graham, quoting the authority of Lord Aberdeen, supported the Administration. Nor was it the least remarkable incident of this curious spectacle to observe the new alliance that had grown iip between Lord John Russell and the late Premier, who were now seen fighting side by side against the Conservative Ministry, after having previously dined together in perfect amity at Cambridge House. Only one thing was clear in the midot of the chaos —that the motion, whether carried or thrown out, would be equally damaging to its supporters and its opponents. If carried, it would force Lord Derby on the country with the delusive cry of "Confiscation or Amnesty;" if thrown out, it would be by so trifling a majority that the Ministerial victory would be worse than a defeat, and it would make patent to the world that the great Parliamentary parties, by which our. constitutional legislation has been usually balanced, are utterly disorganised. No course could have been more inconvenient or disturbing, or less likely to lead to a satisfactory solution of the difficulty, than a general election. The impartial elector, who saw much to applaud in the proclamation, without going the whole length of its severity, and who approved of the principles laid down in the despatch, while he condemned their expression as intemperate, and, at this moment, fraught with danger to our Indian empire, would be sorely puzzled in the disposition of his vote. Party zeal, before which the highest ,interesf:s faae into insignificance, would present gigantic exaggerations and misrepresentations on both, sides, and the House of Commons elected under such circumstances would
be impressed with more fallacious notions concerning the past and future of India than any House of Commons returned during the last 'hundred years. ■ ■".'■'■ '•;': ;:'
The only escape from this complicated dilemma, this imminent danger to ouv possessions in the East, this discreditable, "faction fight" over the spoils of an empire, was the abandonment of the vote of censure. From all parts of the House, except the Ministerial benches, whose occupants, being put upon their trial, could not with dignity have joined in such a request, entreaties arose for the withdrawal of the motion. But Mr. Cardwell was immovable, until Lord Palmerston brought his influence to bear upon the general remonstrance; and when at last the motion was fairly withdrawn, the House rang with cheers. It was a welcome deliverance to all parties. :
The result is one upon which India as well as r England may be congratulated; not because it-;> ensures a further term, uncertain in its dura-':-tion, and by no means promising in its indications, to the Derby administration, but because it satisfied for the present the great questions;.-., upon the settlement of which the security of. our empire in the East depends, from the conflict ■' of party interests Lord Derby's administration is not the Government from which, a priori, the largest amount of good can be anticipated for India. Out of office it resisted the v " clemency" of Lord Canning; in office it resists his severity. Out of office it opposed the measure of the transfer of India to the Crown, as being dangerous at this time; in office it adopts the policy it condemned. It reposed its claims to the confidence of the Indian community on the great powers and large experience of Lord EUenborough; but at the endof a few weeks the indiscretions of Lord Ellenborough compel him to resign as the,only means of saving his colleagues. And as far as anything is yet known of Lord Derby's views with reference to India, it is impossible to form an estimate of the course he is likely to pursue. Submitting to the decision of the Commons, although it was in direct opposition to his avowed convictions, he followed in the track of his predecessor, and brought in a bill for the abolition of the Company. But lie was obliged to withdraw it, in deference to public opinion, and place himself in the hands of the House. What issue will come of this no man can forsee. Still greater obscurity hangs over his policy with reference to the future settlement of India, but more especially of Oude. If .Lord Ellenborough's despatch is to be really carried out —and Lord Dei'by declares it has his entire approval—the Administration is bound to restore the King of Oude to his throne; No language can be more distinct than'that of the paragraphs in which : Lord Ellenboroughintitnates that we have unlawfully taken possession of the kingdom, and that, instead of deserving such treatment from us, the sovereign of Oude and his family were entitled, by long fidelity, to our friendship and protection. Bold and reprehensible as it was to give utterance to such opinions,, we do not apprehend that Lord Derby will venture to follow them to their logical conclusions; but the fact that they have gone forth to India as, the absolute impressions of the Prime Minister, commits him to a position which must embarrass him to some extent. Oh; the other hand there are circumstances connected with his tenure of office which may be turned to much advantage. He isp entirely free from all responsibility as to the causes of the mutiny, or the misgovernment, mistakes, or want of systematic precautions out of which it is variously alleged to have ai'isen. He is not restrained by any personal considerations, or previous acts, from pursuing any line of policy which may seem to him advantageous to the interests of India; and he is deeply concerned in the adoption of a policy likely to impart; popularity and stability to his Government. His opportunity is India. He has everything to gain and little to risk; and we may reasonably hope that so sagacious a statesman, after his recent admonishing experiences, will improve the accidents of fortune, and profit by the perils he has escaped. So :fai" as the Indian communitjl" is concerned, it is unimportant what party, or what minister, Conservative or Liberal, Derby or Palmerstoi, may happen to be in power; but it is of the last importance . that legislation for India should'be conducted oh sound and practical"principles.'' Unless ! some contretemps should'occur. Lard Derby, will, have ample time to develop his plans. The rest ■ of the session is at his disposal, and it is hot anticipated that any question atfecting the safety of the Administration can be raised sooner than February.
We have a striking illustration of the action of party feelings upon public questions in the storm that has been raised about the private note Miv Vernon Smith received from Lord Canning, and did not communicate to Lord Ellenborough. Mr. Smith thought it was nt worth communicating, aad Lord Pahnerston thought, so .too, and Lord Ellenborough himself stated that if it had been communicated to him it would not have altered his course. Indeed there is reason to believe, from Lord Ellenborough's known temperament, that he would have been rather impatient of such a communication. Lord Granville' had also received a private letter from Lord Canning about the same time, and made an attempt to communicate its contents to Lord Ellenborough in the lobby of the House, but his Lordship went off into so long an account of his own views of the affairs of India,' that, says Lord Granville, " after having made one or two ineffectual attempts to get a hearing^ I put the letter in my pocket in despair." We are very far from thinking that Mr. Smith was right in not communicating to his successor the letters he received, however unimportant their contents might have been. But to charge him with the wilful suppression of his • private correspondence, for the purpose of keeping the Government in the dark, is mere party scandal. Out of incidents of" this kind, however, good comes sometimes. The practice which has hitherto existed of conducting part of the correspondence of the public departments in an open official form, and part in private confidential notes, while it is recommended by unquestionable advantages to the publicservice, and can never be entirely dispensed with, is objectionable on many grounds, unless it be stringently restricted within limitations marked out by absolute necessity. Attention having been drawn to the subject, it will be shortly brought before the attention of Parliament. We have reason to believe that it is the intention of Mr. Wise, immediately; after the holidays, to make a motion to the effect that,it is inexpedient-to conduct any portion of the business of the public departments by way of private letters. ,
There is little news of actuaHmovenient from abroad,.but some suggestive hints of movements to come. The Turks, defeated at Gorgova, are said to have made a precipitate retreat; and the Sultan has referred the whole Montenegrin question to the Western Powers, who will interpose for the maintenance of the statics quo. . Between the Courts of Paris and Vienna a coolness has set in, which is said to threaten a rupture in their relations. At home, the Emperor of France has abundant causes of uneasiness in an excitable and unoccupied army, an intractable " budget, and the election of Opposition candidates in the face of his orders. It would not be surprising if he sought for an escape from these troubles in a diversion elsewhere.,
The King of Naples has refused the compensa-. tion demanded by the English Minister for the imprisonment of the engineers. Lord Malmesbury describes the Neapolitan answer rather as an argumentative rejoinder than a categorical rejection of the demand. But all Europe regards it in the latter sense, and it is evident King Ferdinand puts the same construction on it, for he is busily employed in fortifying his coasts, and making a variety of defensive preparations. The Paris Conference resumed its sittings on the 22nd of May. ,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18580824.2.7.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Colonist, Issue 88, 24 August 1858, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
2,043SUMMARY. Colonist, Issue 88, 24 August 1858, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.