Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IRISH AFFAIRS.

The difficulties of tbe Irish question do inot -lessen, and the resolution, of the Executive of the National Council, calling upon Irish members to withdraw from the House of Com-, mops and appeal to the Hague Conference, as cabled recently, will not help matters ‘ much. It is interesting as a side issue, to note at this juncture . a reference to the Sinn Fein, movement, which appears ini the “Belfast Telegraph,” which paper remarks that ‘‘those who have brought about! the retaliation cannot reply that they were nob warned of what they were bringing upon themselves and the -country. It has become fashionable in certain quarters in Ireland to refer to everything coming into the country as ‘foreign.’ It may dome to us from Glasgow, from Liverpool, or ever from cmr nearest point on the opposite -shores —Stanraer. It matters not, it is foreignl, and according to the Sinn Feinr cars is ‘foreign,’ and therefore to be boycotted. Our summer visitors from the same parts of the world are ‘foreigners,’ and it would even appear as if°the term' were made to cover the returned sons and daughters of Irish . parents, settled across the • narrow channel that divides Ireland from the sister countries. Nothing bearing the markrof such origin! may be purchased id Ireland, but conversely it. is not decreed that nothing made in Ireland ‘ . shall be sold to the detested ‘foreigner.’ The latter, however, is doing off his own ba-t what it was here said he would do. He- is retaliating., and Ireland is certain to come worst out of the arrangement. A Correspondent writing in - the columns of a London contemporary, whose • order book! had fallen in a, single journey from £ISOO to £SO in- consequence of the boycott, points o-uti that there are many well-known Irish articles which have a. large sale- in England, and a boycott can be applied by two. What, for instance, about our Northern linens'? Of -Course, that is an Ulster industry, -and Ulster deserved to be punished for its loyalty to Great Britain and the British Crown-. But there is the Irish bacon and egg in-

dustry. Irish tweeds, lace, etc., etc. Ireland left to herself with the markets closed against her through her own fault, would he in. a deplorable plight-, and it is to be hoped the foolish campaign! will be terminated be- * fore it is too late.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN19070523.2.19

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43096, 23 May 1907, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
398

IRISH AFFAIRS. Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43096, 23 May 1907, Page 4

IRISH AFFAIRS. Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43096, 23 May 1907, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert