Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BRITISH NAVY.

On the vexed question of Army reform there are many conflicting opinions, but it may asserted as an undisputabl© fact that the Navy is unanimously regarded as the Empire’s first - Kne of defence. Upon this the people of the Motherland and of the overseas dominions are agreed, j Consequently it is gratifying to find the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty (Mr EL T&>bertson), in eiplaining the Naval Estimates in the House of Commons on Tuesday last, diedaring thiat. the Lords of the Admiralty ■believe the present programme will adequately maintain the two-power standard. In this connection, Mir Robertson pointed out that Russia, France, and Germany together' had' added to their navies 1,108,280 tons in a decade, while Great Britain had added 1,132,205 tons. The .cost per ton for Great Britain was £BB ; for Russia. £93; for Germany, £9*7; and for France, £124. Mr Robertson ’-..showed thiat Great Britain’s twoPower standiard would not be ©n~ dangered' for the next three years and Since 1898 Great Britain’s annual naval expenditure has exceeded the (combined: annual expenditure of France, Russia and Germany. From 1805, when it was £20,000,000,; it gradually increased, until in 1904 It it dfoppiad to £35,389,000. ’lllllO preslent Estimates provide for a total out lay of £30,000,000, The German programme of 1900 provided for an expenditure of on the , construction of new warships bv the year 1916, Injtihe same year Lord Goschen proposed an expenditure of £8,500,000 a year on naval construction, or a total for the same period of £130,000,000. It. waa at that time estimated that on account of the.extra coot per ton Germany’s £70,000,000 would produce only £53,000.000 worth! of ships according to the English standard of expenditure. Lord Goschien’s proposal of ,£8,500,000 a yeaJr has been since greatly exceeded 1 , but the naval construction estimates for this year have been reduced to £8400.000. In the event, however, of disarmament proposals not being agreed to at The Haggle Conference the cost of a third 1 Dreadnought must be added.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN19070316.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43069, 16 March 1907, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

THE BRITISH NAVY. Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43069, 16 March 1907, Page 4

THE BRITISH NAVY. Te Aroha News, Volume XXVI, Issue 43069, 16 March 1907, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert