Correspondence
Lot hold ourselves responsible for f opinions expressed by our corbondents. , [To the Editor.] [-After a lapse of about two he agitators for the, merging pf [itoa Road Board Intbihe Biako Council are, again bn the Iviihout ques'ioning,the’ petition round for signature to that |n the previous occasion. It is keless to think qf imposing any fork upon the County Council’s U they have more now that) In pr 'perly attend to. For an p there is that disgraceful bit [that continues past the railway | Nothing has been done to it pi eman Wattam resigned ; the [of the watertables are choked, prtableo themselves are reeking; ■th in which the' excreta of i occurs in a very noticeable [ion, and the mud renders a [of this road almost impassable Ltrinns. Better let the two [remain in power, or the roads | present ‘Waitoa Road Board L; L become heritable quagmires [e to judge from the treatment [ut to the most important bit of [the whole county.— I am, etc., H. T. Hawkins.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN19060807.2.18
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume XXII, Issue 42992, 7 August 1906, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
171Correspondence Te Aroha News, Volume XXII, Issue 42992, 7 August 1906, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.