TRAVELING EXPENSES. IMPORTANT TO COUNTY COUNCILS. Dunedin, June 12.
J ur-di! Williams gave judgment in fche case of the Auditor General v. the Maniototo County Council. He sees no reason why a County Council should not vote a reasonable sum for travelling expenses, andsays it is empowered to pay them, if tbe Council considers a fixed sum per mile sufficient. He &ees nothing in the Act to prevent it, and thinks the ActoE 1873 intentionally framed to enable county councils to do what the Maniototo Council had done, and so avoid un&cemly discussions which inevitably take place if the reasonableness of every item of individual members expenses had to be. discussed.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18890615.2.24
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 377, 15 June 1889, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
111TRAVELING EXPENSES. IMPORTANT TO COUNTY COUNCILS. Dunedin, June 12. Te Aroha News, Volume VII, Issue 377, 15 June 1889, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in