BREACH OF PROMISE CASE.
Di'VEDix, Sept. 12. In the Supreme Court yesterday, the case of Bell v. Robinson, in which £650 damages were claimed for seduction and breach of promise, was decided. The plaintiff' was nonsuited, her application for a postponement ou the ground of the absence of two material witnesses being refused.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18880915.2.46
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 299, 15 September 1888, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
53BREACH OF PROMISE CASE. Te Aroha News, Volume VI, Issue 299, 15 September 1888, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in