RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before H. A. Stratford, Esq., R.M.,) Tuesday, December 7, 1886.
CIVIL GASES. Smith and Seddon v. G. M. Burke : Claim £8 15s. goods sold and delivered. No appearance of defendant, who applied for an adjournment to enable him to have his evidence taken in Auckland. Adjournment granted till Dec. 21st. E. Quiim v. A. Milgrew : Claim £o 1-is, cash lent. There was no appearance of either party when the case was called, but plaintiff shortly afterwards appeared and permission was* granted him for fiesh summons to issue free of cost. Jas. Jackson v. Joseph Clarke: Claim £4c 8s 9d, for goods supplied. No appearance of defendant. Judgment by default for amount with costs 6s. The whole business of the Court only occupied about a quarter of an hour.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18861211.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 182, 11 December 1886, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
131RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. (Before H. A. Stratford, Esq., R.M.,) Tuesday, December 7, 1886. Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 182, 11 December 1886, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in