MILLS DIVORCE SUIT.
* DuNedin, July 28. In the divorce "fluid Mills v: . Mills and Ferrier, evidence was taken "on commission at Melbourne and handed in to the judge, but not read. ' ' • , ] , Acts of criminalty were proved, to^ have been committed at Naugarata, Melbourne, apd Wiliiamstown. The parties wont Home by the Orient Bteamer under an aasumed name, A detective went on board the same vessel and served ,them-with a citation as they landed in London. Mr Demnstan, who appeared on petition, contended there was nothing to show cotyusion, and no .reason in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, why a decree should not be granted in the absence of the petitioner. The Court took time to consider whether the petitioner's attendance could be dispensed vTithiT ' • < Tho petitioner in this case is Mr James Mill?, managing director of the Union Steamship Company, ajicj.theco-reapon.dent, ia Mr Ferrier, formerly manager of the Bank of New Zealand at Dunedin.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18860731.2.42
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 163, 31 July 1886, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
157MILLS DIVORCE SUIT. Te Aroha News, Volume IV, Issue 163, 31 July 1886, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in