THE CASE OF ELIZA ARMSTRONG. The Prosecution for Abduction.
UU t ukn Mr Stead, of the "Pall Mall Guzette," was moving -heaven and eaith to induce the House of Commons to add certain frp-eially sweeping clauses r* "übduction" to the Criminal Law Amendment AC"., he little thought lhat the tiint pi r^on they would be used against nou d be himself. Now, however, there seems every likelihood ot i his strange Nemet-i* btcoming fact, for on attempting to prove the every - day occnrrenceof gro9? out rages up >n children of the poor, the "apostie of purity" h»e deliberately assisted at what in the eyo of i he law is unquestionably an abduction. In the "rtp.rt" of the "secret comnois finn," the giil Eliza Armstrong figured as '• Lily," and was described as the victim of a particulaily ghastly and brutal outrage which, however, turns out to have been no more than carrying 'he girl through th« foima which ihe u Gazotte" alleges are com mnnly pu.eued in the violation of children. '♦ We did everything aminutaur would have done," says Mr Stead in explanation, 'sim ply stopping shott at the commia-ion of the crime it-elf." It seems Mr Stead got most ot the facts chronicled in his famous "re port" from Hi becca Jarrett, erftwhilo "a procuress," but now a "Salvation Army convHit, and a, good .woman," in whose reformation axi^bona Jides he placed, and still places, "implicit confidence." Thia good lady, as '"'some atonement for past crimes," kindly consented to provide Mr fttead with a young virgin, Bold by her mother for purposes of seduction, for £5. He, Mr Sttad, made no independent inquiries m to whether the mother really knew where and for what purpose the girl was leaving home. He had her taken to a midwife, w,ho, l ',to the child's anger,- pain, and astonishment," periormed on her the indecent assault known to the editor of the " Pa|l'M all Gazette .".and friends as^certi fyiug to, » maidenV .virginity." Thence 'the poor, girl was, conveyed to a- brothel, and drugge^with,. chloroform,,- Mr fc^te^d, .remaining ajoneiri.a room .with her for half a ; hour. " n no other way," cays this ;gentleman, triumphantly, «.* could we have ( ,■ < •; * ;"-,m ; i, s* ,; • . •»•!. ; .':.•• r
proved by our own knowledge that a mid.wife .wQiulj^cArjify Jap- iuirapral purpose^ would Bell chloroform for drugging the victim', lon that! a •.brothehkee.per would altoV-a child ao : young Uo be, adoiiitvd to her 3 pram isea for ,i purposes •of viulation. " .After, t tbiB,ithe-. child, wus taken , away' to. Fia»cej and, has only now been restored to, her parents by direct inteivenwon of the police.. . • i<
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18851024.2.13.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Te Aroha News, Volume III, Issue 125, 24 October 1885, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
432THE CASE OF ELIZA ARMSTRONG. The Prosecution for Abduction. Te Aroha News, Volume III, Issue 125, 24 October 1885, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.