Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHOULD A DOCTOR TELL?

; LONDON JUDGE'S OPINION. Once more that old question, ''Should a Doctor tell?'' has cropped up, this time in the London Divorce Court. ~ i It arose on the point whether a doc- : tor is entitled to give evidence on 1 confidential matters gathered by him in the secrecy of the consulting room : concerning his patients. i Mr Justice McCardie was the Judge • before whom the question arose when ! Dr Soloman Kadinsky ,senior medical officer at Westminster Hospital, was called to give evidence as to disease ; for which, it was said, he had treated i a woman, resulting, so it was alleged. ■ from hi s husband's misconduct. On entering the witness-box the . doctor handed a letter to the Judge 1 from the chairman of the house' com- ; mittee of Westminster Hospital, enI closing a copy of the regulation under I which patients are' treated, and sax - ing: "All information obtained in regard ro any person treated under the scheme shall be regarded as confidential.'' ! Unless ordered 'by the Court to do . so, he objected to make any statement. : It would be appreciated by the doe- '■ tor, said the Judge, that in courts of j .justice there were even higher eonsidI erations than those which prevailed-in | the position of medical men. Apart from the obligations imposed |by the order of the Judges, it was : most desirable that there should be the ' : utmost loyal observance of that co-i----j lidence imposed On doctors by patients. Always the history of the profession i had been most honourable. j 'Thereupon the doctor gave evidence, j ■ ; "What muddle seperfLuous prepaj ration, makes." —Stanus. Certainly be prepared, for wise preparation. means also the battle half I won; but superfluous preparation is i ill-advised. Always be prepared durI ing winter time, which to the unpreI pared is chronic cough and cold time | Baxter's Lung Preserver is ample I preparation., for this sterling remedy jis a sure, safe and prompt remedy. I It nips the trouble in the bud and fortifies against the return visit. The home that knows "Baxter's"' is J cough and cold proof. Get large bot- | vie of this 34-ycar-old specific to-day. I ! ' l

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAIDT19200628.2.3

Bibliographic details

Taihape Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3514, 28 June 1920, Page 2

Word Count
360

SHOULD A DOCTOR TELL? Taihape Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3514, 28 June 1920, Page 2

SHOULD A DOCTOR TELL? Taihape Daily Times, Volume XI, Issue 3514, 28 June 1920, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert