Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EDUCATION REPORT

MOTION OF THANKS PASSED j CONGRATULATION WITHHELD Press Association WELLINGTON, Tuesday. The question whether the Minister of Education, the Hon. H. Atmore, and the committee which recently inquired into the education system should be congratulated upon the proposals submitted to Parliament, was discussed at length at the conference of the Technical Education Association today. In the end it was decided to pass a resolution expressing thanks only. A proposal that congratulations should be tendered upon the complete and comprehensive nature of the report to Parliament was submitted by Mr. J. Hutton (Greymouth), who said they would recognise the excellent intentions in the report. Mr. G. J. Park (Auckland) seconded the motion. Mr. W. F. Durward (Palmerston North) expressed the hope that the report would not go through. He said: “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hand is the hand of Esau.” Mr. E. M. Andrews (Christchurch) suggested tliat the remit should use the word “thoughtful.” | Air. H. S. W. King (Auckland) said I it would mislead the public if the con--1 lerence were to congratulate the conimitteo upon the report before it had • been considered by the conference. “Air. Andrews suggests saying ‘thoughtful,’ ” said Air. King, “but I would rather say ‘laborious.’ That does not convey any compliment.” Other delegates said they thought they should be content with expressing thanks lor the report. Air. King moved an amendment that the Minister and committee bo thankedlor the comprehensive nature of the report, with some parts of which the conference would probably find itself in agreement. “I will not mince my words,” he said. “We have quite enough camouflage in the report. We do not want camouflage here, but we want to be courteous. We cannot accept the recommendations as a whole, although there are many we can accept.” Finally a non-committal remit was passed expressing thanks lor the reporti

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300911.2.59

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1074, 11 September 1930, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
313

EDUCATION REPORT Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1074, 11 September 1930, Page 7

EDUCATION REPORT Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1074, 11 September 1930, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert