LICENSING PUZZLE
WHEN IS A VISITOR NOT w A VISITOR?
uquor IN CLOSED hours
„ hoarder at an hotel invite a Can . have a drink during closed S” est onless he has legitimate busilour3 tn U discuss? And is the onus on o£ the hotel to find if the fts/wlTis legitimate before he serves were discussed at the rneue v to( jay when James NorPol a e bane licensee of the Carpenter’s .Hotel was charged with exposfor sale during closed hours, “Vwith keeping open tor sale Wil--0.1 e a boarder at the hotel, was J “hTrsted with assisting a third man ( “a r ocas to procure liquor. A plea I e ? g untTw.s P entered by Mr. Bag-, " Tie case, as outlined by the police, ; that on Sunday, June la, & serand constable gained admission 3 me hotel at 11.15 a.m. After going mne the passage they came to a Tm at the end of which was a bar, rtere two men were drinking. “when I asked the licensee who the 'men were he said that one was oj.g who was a boarder, and the S r was a mail named Lucas, a guest 7rW's” said the sergeant. Bigl’s story was that he had stayed he hotel the previous night and f„er breakfast on Sunday morning gone for a walk. He met Lucas U invited him to corno to the ho„el !»d have a drink. The licensee could *? show that Iligg had stayed at the hotel, as he said he did not keep full be disputed that a hoarder ,ent out and picked up another man ~ , he sole purpose of drinking 'ioßor ” said Sub-Inspector Shanahau. It has been held in previous cases ■iiat if the inviting party brought a ~n m solely for the purpose of drmkan offence has been committed nd the licensee is also responsible. Z onU s is on the licensee to know thether they have legitimate business tefore he serves them.’’ •Are you suggesting that this is the Jd*case of a paying boarder in the 1 muse?” asked Mr. F. K. Hunt, S.M. j The sub-inspector said there was no such suggestion, nor that the happing was a common one. Ur Bagnall pointed out that the licensee had been quite frank when luestioned. „ ~ "I can’t convict the licensee, said the magistrate. “However, he must &e more careful in future. The charges against him are dismissed.” In the case of Bigg, a fine ot £2 and 10s costs was inflicted, Mr. Hunt stating that the law was clear drink could be supplied only to a legitimate visitor.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300815.2.161
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1051, 15 August 1930, Page 13
Word Count
428LICENSING PUZZLE Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1051, 15 August 1930, Page 13
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.