Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DAMAGES SUIT FAILS

WIDOW’S CLAIM FOR HUSBAND’S DEATH VERDICT FOR CONTRACTOR A unanimous verdict for the defendant was returned by a jury in the Supreme Court late yesterday afternoon, in the action brought by a widow, Annie Irwin, claiming £2,500 damages from W. Lovett for the death of her husband, who was fatally injured through being run over by one of defendant’s motor-lorries. Judgment for the defendant was entered accordingly. The victim of the accident was Thomas Irwin, a City Council employee, who on the morning of February 20 was engaged in spreading sand over the freshly-tarred surface of Hopetoun Street. Ponsonby. He was run over by a lorry bringing a load of sand to the scene of operations, and died in hospital later the same day.

The widow's claim was based on allegations of negligence on the part of the driver, and the defence of ‘inevitable accident,” or, alternatively, of negligence on the part of Irwin, was raised.

Mr. A. H. Johnstone appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. E. H. Xorthcroft. represented the defendant. NOT CHARITABLE INSTITUTION

In the course of his summing up. Mr. Justice Herdman said that a court of justice was not a charitable institution. His Honour stressed the fact that when a plaintiff came to court seeking damages he was bound to prove that the defendant had been guilty of some neglect, and in the present case, one eyewitness of the accident. who had testified for the plaintiff. considered that the motor-lorry driver was not guilty of any neglect. Everyone sympathised with the widow and children, the Judge added, but if juries in Xew Zealand were to give verdicts based upon sympathy alone, without regard to the evidence, a scandal was perpetrated, and the administration of justice was to some extent tarnished.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300812.2.38

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1048, 12 August 1930, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
297

DAMAGES SUIT FAILS Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1048, 12 August 1930, Page 7

DAMAGES SUIT FAILS Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1048, 12 August 1930, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert