Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOVERNMENTS POSITION

“SHOULD RESIGN,” SAYS INDEPENDENT LABOUR OPPOSITION 3 'TIE SUS’S Parliamentary Reporter PARLIAMENT BLDGS., Tuesday. The gauge was thrown down to the Government this evening by a Labour member, who hinted that in bringing down the Customs Bill the Govern ment might find itself in an awkward position. He was Mr. W. E. Barnard (Labour —Napier). Later Mr. C. A. Wilkinson (Independent—Egmont) said that as it had dishonoured its election pledges the Government should resign.

Mr. Barnard said the leaders of the Reform and labour Parties were agreeable to the Government having its way with the resolutions, and as that seemed the usual thing he must accede to that policy. The fact, however, had to be taken into consideration that Reform and Labour might act together on the tariff proposals, and then the Government might find itself in a very awkward position. Whatever the Labour Party did it would, as the leader, Mr. Holland, had stated, act fearlessly. The Government’s proposals, said Mr. Barnard, were a Jumbled mixture of good, bad and indifferent, and the House was entitled to know the Government’s principles ,on the question. Mr. Barnard did not want the Prime Minister to think he was throwing out idle threats, because many things had to be considered very seriously by the members of the House, and he was afraid the Government would be forced to accept drastic amendments. Mr. J. S. Fletcher (Independent — Grey Lynn) said he would oppose the Customs Bill whole-heartedly. The Prime Minister, he said, was in the position of a blind Samson pulling down the pillars of the temple. He urged that the country’s finances as outlined in the Budget should be be fore the House before the tariff pro posals were considered. Mr. W. E. Parry (Labour —Auckland Central) said there was a good deal in what Mr. Fletcher said. It seemed that without the Budget the House was in the position of a child whose mother told it to shut its eyes and open its mouth and see what the Government would send it. (Laughter.) Mr. Wilkinson said the Government had not honoured the pledges given to the country £nd it should resign. That was the constitutional procedure.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300723.2.103

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1031, 23 July 1930, Page 13

Word Count
367

GOVERNMENTS POSITION Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1031, 23 July 1930, Page 13

GOVERNMENTS POSITION Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1031, 23 July 1930, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert