TEACHERS AT LAW
“BUSINESS IN EDUCATION" COURSES
CROSS-SUITS IN COURT A retired headmaster. Robert TW dore Reid, now of Otahuhu. and Whangarei school teacher. lan g,.* man Macken. figured in rross-cbSli heard by the Chief Justice s' • Michael Myers, in the Supreme c/T today. Reid sought the taking of acco«as between himself and Macken ■ connection with a corr. -poadetZ course for teachers, under the / of “Business in Education.” by Macken. In another suit. Mac/' applied for an injunction to rest/; Reid front acting independents s promoting the sale of stationery.' ‘ 3 INJURED BY MURDERER The fact that Mr. Reid *a* tk. headmaster of the Waikino School i lhe ‘'n l6 » h a« Higgins committee child murder in the school in ue I was mentioned by Mr. Chaimer* ,L the plaintiff. Counsel added thatf/ lowing his being wounded by or. I of the murderer's shots, Mr. ReidW . retired. Early in 1929. according to u. Chalmers. Macken entered into ~ arrangement with Reid to be Domiv ion organiser for the “Business s Education” correspondence course trteachers. Reid was to be paid M / cent, commission on all sales in the Auckland Province, and on a centage basis on all orders he tained from other parts of New land. Subsequently when Reid fomj this basis of working was unprotii able, he asked for a saiarv of £i , day in addition. In February th« year, a new basis was -uggested hv Reid, and by which he was to hit. complete charge of the stationerv i of the business, and that a sepant, agreement should be made for con. ducting education tests and tt, d )f . tribution of a “teachers' guide. REDUCING COSTS When Macken approached hi B plaintiff stated, in evidence, he in, given to understand that an effort wm 1 being made to reduce the cost of inj struction to teachers and to lighten I their work. He was also advised tte 1 large supplies of materials had beeordered in England, and these were to arrive here in May. 1929. He Macken’s suggestion that he snouid act as organising manager, and list | he should arrange for a retired teacher in each educational district outside J Auckland to carry out organisms ! on a 20 per cent, commission basic He was under the impress on that the : 8.1. E. was an association of teachers, but he was informed by Mackes that it was a “personal business.” An assurance was given witness bv attendant that he had £2.000 at call and an overdraft of £BOO available if d- , sired. ; During the course of the cross-exam- ; ination his Honour commented that j the Court was placed in the embaij rassiqg position of having to deetd-' who was telling the truth between lit persons who were swearing to stork* • diametrically opposed. That positir* would not have arisen, added his Horn our. had the two people, who set out to teach others “business in cduc*. tion.” observed an elementary pricciple—and reduced the agreement U writins. 'Proceeding.)
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300722.2.107
Bibliographic details
Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1030, 22 July 1930, Page 10
Word Count
495TEACHERS AT LAW Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1030, 22 July 1930, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Sun (Auckland). You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.