Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HARDWARE ASSISTANTS

NEW AWARD RATES OF WAGES OBJECTION TO ONE CLAUSE The rates of wages under the new award of the Auckland Hardware Assistants, on which an agreement has been reached on all clauses except one, which was considered by the Arbitration Court today, have been settled as under: Boys under 16 to start at 15s a week and rise by annual increments to £4 5s in the sixth year; boys between 10 and 17 and 17 and IS to start at 20s a week and by annual increments rise to £4 5s in the sixth year; boys between IS and 19 start at 30s a week and rise by annual increments to £ 4 5s in the sixth year; boys 19 and over start at 40s a week and rise by increments to £4 5s in the sixth year. First assistants receive £4 15s.

The clause on which the parties disagreed was the following, proposed by the employers:—“That employment shall bo deemed to be weekly employment. and no deduction shall be made from the weekly wage, except for time lost through the worker’s sickness or his absence from work, through no fault of the employer.”

On behalf of the employers, Mr. S. E. Wright said the clause was common to most awards and was a protection to the worker besides the employer, and also safeguarded the employer against malingering. He said that no unfair advantage had been taken under the clause in the past. For the union, Mr. W. Miller said that the latter portion of the proposed clause was objected to. He argued that, in view of the fact that no deductions had been made in the past in cases of genuine sickness, the clause in the old award should be reinstated. He claimed that the suggested clause extended a little farther than was reasonable and he contended it would be unfair to tack it on to the hardware assistants.

Mr. Justice Frazer announced the court would reserve its decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19300708.2.161

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1018, 8 July 1930, Page 14

Word Count
331

HARDWARE ASSISTANTS Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1018, 8 July 1930, Page 14

HARDWARE ASSISTANTS Sun (Auckland), Volume IV, Issue 1018, 8 July 1930, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert